🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.